From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
ying.huang@intel.com, philip.li@intel.com, julie.du@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] format-patch: add '--base' option to record base tree info
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 23:56:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160409155630.GA2046@yexl-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy48yo8eb.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:38:04AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> diff --git a/builtin/log.c b/builtin/log.c
>> index 0d738d6..03cbab0 100644
>> --- a/builtin/log.c
>> +++ b/builtin/log.c
>> @@ -1185,6 +1185,82 @@ static int from_callback(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int unset)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +struct base_tree_info {
>> + struct object_id base_commit;
>> + int nr_patch_id, alloc_patch_id;
>> + struct object_id *patch_id;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void prepare_bases(struct base_tree_info *bases,
>> + const char *base_commit,
>> + struct commit **list,
>> + int total)
>> +{
>> + struct commit *base = NULL, *commit;
>> + struct rev_info revs;
>> + struct diff_options diffopt;
>> + struct object_id *patch_id;
>> + unsigned char sha1[20];
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + diff_setup(&diffopt);
>> + DIFF_OPT_SET(&diffopt, RECURSIVE);
>> + diff_setup_done(&diffopt);
>> +
>> + base = lookup_commit_reference_by_name(base_commit);
>> + if (!base)
>> + die(_("Unknown commit %s"), base_commit);
>> + oidcpy(&bases->base_commit, &base->object.oid);
>> +
>> + init_revisions(&revs, NULL);
>> + revs.max_parents = 1;
>> + base->object.flags |= UNINTERESTING;
>> + add_pending_object(&revs, &base->object, "base");
>> + for (i = 0; i < total; i++) {
>> + list[i]->object.flags |= 0;
>
>What does this statement do, exactly? Are you clearing some bits
>but not others, and if so which ones?
>
>> + add_pending_object(&revs, &list[i]->object, "rev_list");
>> + list[i]->util = (void *)1;
>
>Are we sure commit objects not on the list have their ->util cleared?
>The while() loop below seems to rely on that to correctly filter out
>the ones that are on the list.
>
After some investigation and according to my understanding, the commit
object is allocated through alloc_commit_node->alloc_node,
void *alloc_commit_node(void)
{
struct commit *c = alloc_node(&commit_state, sizeof(struct commit));
c->object.type = OBJ_COMMIT;
c->index = alloc_commit_index();
return c;
}
static inline void *alloc_node(struct alloc_state *s, size_t node_size)
{
void *ret;
if (!s->nr) {
s->nr = BLOCKING;
s->p = xmalloc(BLOCKING * node_size);
}
s->nr--;
s->count++;
ret = s->p;
s->p = (char *)s->p + node_size;
memset(ret, 0, node_size);
return ret;
}
So the commit->util should be cleared after initialization, and it has
not been touched except above "for" loop in our code execution path, I think
it is safe to rely on it to filter out commits that are on the rev list.
Thanks,
Xiaolong.
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (prepare_revision_walk(&revs))
>> + die(_("revision walk setup failed"));
>> + /*
>> + * Traverse the prerequisite commits list,
>> + * get the patch ids and stuff them in bases structure.
>> + */
>> + while ((commit = get_revision(&revs)) != NULL) {
>> + if (commit->util)
>> + continue;
>> + if (commit_patch_id(commit, &diffopt, sha1))
>> + die(_("cannot get patch id"));
>> + ALLOC_GROW(bases->patch_id, bases->nr_patch_id + 1, bases->alloc_patch_id);
>> + patch_id = bases->patch_id + bases->nr_patch_id;
>> + hashcpy(patch_id->hash, sha1);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-09 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-31 1:46 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add an option to git-format-patch to record base tree info Xiaolong Ye
2016-03-31 1:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] patch-ids: make commit_patch_id() a public helper function Xiaolong Ye
2016-03-31 1:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] format-patch: add '--base' option to record base tree info Xiaolong Ye
2016-03-31 17:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-01 13:38 ` Ye Xiaolong
2016-04-01 16:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-05 5:52 ` Ye Xiaolong
2016-04-09 15:56 ` Ye Xiaolong [this message]
2016-03-31 1:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] format-patch: introduce --base=auto option Xiaolong Ye
2016-03-31 17:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-01 13:52 ` Ye Xiaolong
2016-04-01 16:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-05 6:36 ` Ye Xiaolong
2016-04-05 7:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-03-31 1:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] format-patch: introduce format.base configuration Xiaolong Ye
2016-03-31 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Add an option to git-format-patch to record base tree info Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160409155630.GA2046@yexl-desktop \
--to=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=julie.du@intel.com \
--cc=philip.li@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).