From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2015, #05; Tue, 15) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:50:45 -0500 Message-ID: <20151216005045.GA31433@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20151215233207.GA30294@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Dec 16 01:50:57 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a90Iv-0006nn-GS for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 01:50:53 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965526AbbLPAut (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:50:49 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:42765 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932608AbbLPAus (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:50:48 -0500 Received: (qmail 25345 invoked by uid 102); 16 Dec 2015 00:50:48 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 18:50:48 -0600 Received: (qmail 22600 invoked by uid 107); 16 Dec 2015 00:50:55 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:50:55 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:50:45 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 03:44:42PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > There already was strbuf_getline_crlf(), and I wanted a new name to > > be conservative. > > When I re-read the series, I realize that the existing one had > exactly the same semantics as strbuf_gets(), so I think no risk > would come from reusing that name. Let me try redoing the series > when I find time ;-) Heh. I just made up that name, not realizing it existed. Looks like it is fairly recent as part of builtin-am, which explains why I hadn't seen it yet. I agree it looks like it does what you want. Upon reading your first message I thought "eh, did I totally misunderstand the intent of the series?", but it looks like we are on the same page. :) -Peff