From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] config: add options to list only variable names Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 17:08:26 -0400 Message-ID: <20150527210826.GD22815@peff.net> References: <1432757240-4445-1-git-send-email-szeder@ira.uka.de> <20150527210438.GB22815@peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: SZEDER =?utf-8?B?R8OhYm9y?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 27 23:08:35 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YxiYz-0002Qp-SE for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 23:08:34 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751760AbbE0VI3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 17:08:29 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:36897 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751575AbbE0VI3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 17:08:29 -0400 Received: (qmail 14305 invoked by uid 102); 27 May 2015 21:08:29 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 27 May 2015 16:08:29 -0500 Received: (qmail 10657 invoked by uid 107); 27 May 2015 21:08:33 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 27 May 2015 17:08:33 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 27 May 2015 17:08:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150527210438.GB22815@peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:04:38PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > -'git config' [] [-z|--null] -l | --list > > +'git config' [] [-z|--null] -l | --list | --list-name > > s/list-name/&s/, to match the code (and your commit message). Doh, just saw your "1.5". FWIW, I expected "PATCH 1.5/2" to be "eh, I should have put this in between patches 1 and 2". I expect a re-roll to be "v1.5" (or just "v2"). This was the only real error in the patch, so your 1.5 looks OK to me. Though I hope you will consider my other suggestions, too. -Peff