From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [RFC/WIP PATCH 08/11] transport: connect_setup appends protocol version number Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 02:56:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20150527065617.GF885@peff.net> References: <1432677675-5118-1-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> <1432677675-5118-9-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Stefan Beller , "git@vger.kernel.org" , Duy Nguyen To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 27 08:56:27 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YxVGN-0005G4-6X for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 08:56:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752441AbbE0G4W (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 02:56:22 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:36498 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751511AbbE0G4U (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 02:56:20 -0400 Received: (qmail 32504 invoked by uid 102); 27 May 2015 06:56:20 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 27 May 2015 01:56:20 -0500 Received: (qmail 5030 invoked by uid 107); 27 May 2015 06:56:24 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 27 May 2015 02:56:24 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 27 May 2015 02:56:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:09:45PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Stefan Beller writes: > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> > >> if (...->version < 2) { > >> ... append "-%d" ... > >> } > >> > >> involved. > > > > Oh! I see here you would count the current one as 1, which has no > > number extension, and any further would have a -${version}. That > > would transport the intention much better I guess. > > Yeah, except that I screwed up my comparison. Obviously, I should > have said "If version is 2 or later, then append -%d to the name, > otherwise use the name as-is". FWIW, I had similar head-scratching over Stefan's original. I think it's OK to say "version 1 is magical, and for historical reasons does not have its number appended". There's no need for us ever to make "upload-pack-1"; it just introduces more headaches. -Peff