From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [RFC/WIP PATCH 06/11] remote.h: add get_remote_capabilities, request_capabilities Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 02:50:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20150527065030.GE885@peff.net> References: <1432677675-5118-1-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> <1432677675-5118-7-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Stefan Beller , Git List , =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , Junio C Hamano To: Eric Sunshine X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 27 08:50:43 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YxVAn-0002a4-9i for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 08:50:41 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751304AbbE0Gue (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 02:50:34 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:36486 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750812AbbE0Gud (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 02:50:33 -0400 Received: (qmail 32196 invoked by uid 102); 27 May 2015 06:50:33 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 27 May 2015 01:50:33 -0500 Received: (qmail 4965 invoked by uid 107); 27 May 2015 06:50:37 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 27 May 2015 02:50:37 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 27 May 2015 02:50:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:25:05PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote: > > + len = packet_read(in, &src_buf, &src_len, > > + packet_buffer, sizeof(packet_buffer), > > + PACKET_READ_GENTLE_ON_EOF | > > + PACKET_READ_CHOMP_NEWLINE); > > + if (len < 0) > > + die_initial_contact(0); > > + > > + if (!len) > > + break; > > + > > + if (len > 4 && skip_prefix(line, "ERR ", &arg)) > > The 'len > 4' check is needed because there's no guarantee that 'line' > is NUL-terminated. Correct? I think this was just blindly copied from get_remote_heads(). And I think that code was being overly paranoid. Ever since f3a3214 (Make send/receive-pack be closer to doing something interesting, 2005-06-29), the pkt-line reader will add an extra NUL to the buffer to ease cases like this. -Peff