From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [RFC/WIP PATCH 05/11] transport: add infrastructure to support a protocol version number Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 02:39:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20150527063925.GC885@peff.net> References: <1432677675-5118-1-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> <1432677675-5118-6-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, pclouds@gmail.com, gitster@pobox.com To: Stefan Beller X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 27 08:39:33 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YxV00-0005h4-Eu for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 08:39:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752298AbbE0Gj2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 02:39:28 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:36474 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751417AbbE0Gj1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 02:39:27 -0400 Received: (qmail 31446 invoked by uid 102); 27 May 2015 06:39:27 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 27 May 2015 01:39:27 -0500 Received: (qmail 4875 invoked by uid 107); 27 May 2015 06:39:31 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 27 May 2015 02:39:31 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 27 May 2015 02:39:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1432677675-5118-6-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 03:01:09PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > + OPT_STRING('y', "transport-version", &transport_version, > + N_("transport-version"), > + N_("specify transport version to be used")), Interesting choice for the short option ("-v" would be nice, but obviously it is taken). Do we want to delay on claiming the short-and-sweet 'y' until we are sure this is something people will use a lot? In an ideal world, it is not (i.e., auto-upgrade and other tricks become good enough that nobody bothers to specify it manually). -Peff