From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Promoting Git developers Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:43:51 -0400 Message-ID: <20150312224351.GC24492@peff.net> References: <20150311073129.GA5947@peff.net> <20150311075429.GA10300@peff.net> <20150312223131.GA24492@peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: "Jason St. John" , Christian Couder , Michael J Gruber , David Kastrup , git To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 12 23:44:00 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YWBpf-00076w-5Y for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 23:43:59 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751555AbbCLWny (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:43:54 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:60731 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750848AbbCLWny (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:43:54 -0400 Received: (qmail 14670 invoked by uid 102); 12 Mar 2015 22:43:53 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:43:53 -0500 Received: (qmail 7161 invoked by uid 107); 12 Mar 2015 22:44:03 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:44:03 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:43:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:36:46PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I hadn't thought about it when I originally suggested this, but of > > course "new" is not strictly meaningful in a world with branches. If you > > contribute a bugfix on top of v2.0.0 that goes to "maint", do you get to > > be new in v2.0.1 _and_ in v2.2.0? > > Yeah, tricky. How about > > New contributors whose contributions weren't in $previous are as follows. > Welcome to the Git development community! Yeah, that makes a lot of sense to me, and then we can have it in both places. I suspect the releases from "master" get a lot more readers, but if we had to pick only one, people with bugfixes would generally be mentioned in "maint" announcements. -Peff