From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luis Ressel Subject: [GSoC microproject] Add XDG support to the credential-store helper Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 21:51:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20150305215146.394caa71@gentp.lnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 05 22:09:37 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YTd1U-0008RF-7m for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 22:09:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754552AbbCEVJc (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:09:32 -0500 Received: from wp260.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.133.29]:40774 "EHLO wp260.webpack.hosteurope.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751693AbbCEVJb (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:09:31 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1061 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 16:09:30 EST Received: from hsi-kbw-046-005-229-078.hsi8.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de ([46.5.229.78] helo=gentp.lnet); authenticated by wp260.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1YTckF-0000Mb-Ji; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 21:51:47 +0100 Received: from gentp.lnet (gentp.lnet [IPv6:::1]) by gentp.lnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A0F260166; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 21:51:46 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;aranea@aixah.de;1425589771;338c6d39; Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: I'm contributing this patch in preparation for a GSoC15 application with the git project. In particular, I'm interested in the two bisect improvements listed on the Ideas page. Does anyone have other suggestions for potential improvements of git bisect that would be suitable for such a GSoC project? Oh, and should I add a testcase for the new functionality introduced by this patch? And if yes, what exactly should I test? Also, apologies if these mails arrive twice. I'm resending them because Majordomo seems to have ignored my initial attempt 6 hours ago. Regards, Luis Ressel