From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mv: prevent mismatched data when ignoring errors. Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 22:00:52 -0400 Message-ID: <20140316020051.GB20019@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1394306499-50871-1-git-send-email-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <1394909812-92472-1-git-send-email-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jens Lehmann , John Keeping , Junio C Hamano , Guillaume Gelin To: "brian m. carlson" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Mar 16 03:01:01 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WP0Nm-0001NR-TR for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 03:00:59 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755188AbaCPCAy (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Mar 2014 22:00:54 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:40332 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755062AbaCPCAy (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Mar 2014 22:00:54 -0400 Received: (qmail 3498 invoked by uid 102); 16 Mar 2014 02:00:54 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 21:00:54 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 15 Mar 2014 22:00:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1394909812-92472-1-git-send-email-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 06:56:52PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: > We shrink the source and destination arrays, but not the modes or > submodule_gitfile arrays, resulting in potentially mismatched data. Shrink > all the arrays at the same time to prevent this. Add tests to ensure the > problem does not recur. > > Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson > --- > > I attempted to come up with a second patch that would refactor out the > four different arrays into one array of struct, as Jeff suggested, but > it became very ugly very quickly. So this patch simply fixes the > problem and adds tests. >>From my brief look, I feared that might be the case. Oh well, thanks for trying. -Peff