From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] general style: replaces memcmp() with proper starts_with() Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:57:58 -0400 Message-ID: <20140314045758.GA32748@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1394635434-44979-1-git-send-email-quintus.public@gmail.com> <20140312175624.GA7982@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20140312194943.GA2912@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20140312211415.GA10305@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20140312220640.GA14802@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List To: Quint Guvernator X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 14 05:58:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WOKC7-0005Q6-QQ for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:58:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752101AbaCNE6B (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:58:01 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:39259 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751860AbaCNE6A (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:58:00 -0400 Received: (qmail 2466 invoked by uid 102); 14 Mar 2014 04:58:01 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 23:58:00 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:57:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:33:50PM -0400, Quint Guvernator wrote: > It is _not_ my goal to make the code harder to maintain down the road. > So, at this point, which hunks (if any) are worth patching? This discussion ended up encompassing a lot of other related cleanups. I hope we didn't scare you away. :) My understanding is that you were approaching this as a micro-project for GSoC. I'd love it if you want to pick up and run with some of the ideas discussed here. But as far as a microproject goes, I think it would make sense to identify one or two no-brainer improvement spots by hand, and submit a patch with just those (and I think Junio gave some good guidelines in his reply). -Peff