From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Globbing for ignored branches? Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:55:38 -0500 Message-ID: <20140124185538.GA9836@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20140124090104.GA396@x4> <0C723FEB5B4E5642B25B451BA57E273075148284@S1P5DAG3C.EXCHPROD.USA.NET> <20140124170739.GC396@x4> <20140124170909.GD396@x4> <20140124182341.GB8202@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20140124183222.GE396@x4> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Jim Garrison , "git@vger.kernel.org" To: Markus Trippelsdorf X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 24 19:55:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W6lur-0007Wc-A9 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:55:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752435AbaAXSzl (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:55:41 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:38309 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751789AbaAXSzk (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:55:40 -0500 Received: (qmail 1645 invoked by uid 102); 24 Jan 2014 18:55:40 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:55:40 -0600 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:55:38 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140124183222.GE396@x4> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 07:32:22PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > However, you do have to specify each branch individually. You probably > > want to say "all branches except X", and you cannot currently specify > > a negative refspec like that. > > Yes, that was the question I wanted to ask (, sorry for not formulating > it more clearly). > Is this "negative refspec for branches" a feature that is planned for > the future? It is something that has been talked about before, but I do not think anybody is actively working on. It would probably not be too hard a feature if you are interested in getting your feet wet in git development. :) -Peff