From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Git tag output order is incorrect (IMHO) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:56:21 -0400 Message-ID: <20131016175621.GA4308@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <840FACA0-7E13-41DB-A0F8-124FAB53BFBD@rtcamp.com> <87wqon7ok4.fsf@igel.home> <7vli52uym0.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20130720002241.GA22143@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130908080311.GA25498@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git To: Antoine Pelisse X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 16 19:56:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VWVKi-0007ad-Kq for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 19:56:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761931Ab3JPR40 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:56:26 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:50489 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1761928Ab3JPR4X (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:56:23 -0400 Received: (qmail 14529 invoked by uid 102); 16 Oct 2013 17:56:23 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:56:23 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:56:21 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130908080311.GA25498@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 04:03:11AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > I have some free time to come, and would like to work on that feature. > > Does the offer still hold ? > > If it does, I would be interested in your patches. > > I'm sorry I have taken so long to get back to you on this. I was hoping > to revisit the topic and make sure the patches were in a sensible state > for showing to somebody. But it took me some time to get around to it, > and now that I have, they're really not looking very good. Hi Antoine, Since I haven't heard anything, I assume you haven't been working on this. But in case you have, I wanted to let you know I found some time and moved the topic forward a bit. It's not quite ready to share with the list, but I wanted to notify you so we didn't duplicate effort. -Peff