git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, "Carlos Martín Nieto" <cmn@elego.de>,
	"Michael Schubert" <mschub@elegosoft.com>,
	"Johan Herland" <johan@herland.net>
Subject: Re: Local tag killer
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 03:51:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130924075119.GD7257@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <523D3FD2.4090002@alum.mit.edu>

On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 08:42:26AM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:

> I think it would be preferable if "--prune" would *not* affect tags, and
> if there were an extra option like "--prune-tags" that would have to be
> used explicitly to cause tags to be pruned.  Would somebody object to
> such a change?

I think most of this problem is the way that we fetch tags straight into
the refs/tags hierarchy. You would not do:

  [remote "origin"]
  fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/heads/*
  prune = true

unless you wanted to be a pure-mirror, because you would hose your local
changes any time you fetched. But that is _exactly_ what we do with a
refs/tags/*:refs/tags/* fetch.

If we instead moved to a default fetch refspec more like:

  [remote "origin"]
  fetch = +refs/*:refs/remotes/origin/refs/*

Then everything would Just Work. If you prune what the other side has
locally, that's fine. All you're doing is pruning your view of what he
has, not anything you've done locally.

The tricky part is tweaking the lookup rules so that "origin/master"
still works, and that looking for "v1.0" checks both refs/tags and
refs/remotes/*/refs/tags. And of course managing backwards
compatibility. :)

In the meantime, I'd almost be tempted to say that "--prune" should
refuse to work when we are touching anything outside of refs/remotes/.
But that would make true mirrors fail, who do want to munge their local
refs/heads/. You'd need some way to say "no, really, it's OK to prune".
Maybe let remote.*.prune be "remotes", "always", or "none", and "true"
maps to "remotes"? That's not backwards compatible, but it would be much
safer.

-Peff

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-24  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-13  2:54 Local tag killer Michael Haggerty
2013-09-13  4:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-20 22:51   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-21  6:42     ` Michael Haggerty
2013-09-21 12:28       ` John Szakmeister
2013-09-24  7:51       ` Jeff King [this message]
2013-09-24 13:22         ` Marc Branchaud
2013-09-25  8:22           ` Jeff King
2013-09-25 22:54         ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-09-28 12:20           ` Michael Haggerty
2013-09-28 21:42             ` Johan Herland
2013-09-29  4:29               ` Michael Haggerty
2013-09-29  9:30                 ` Johan Herland
2013-09-30 15:24                 ` Marc Branchaud
2013-09-30 15:52                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-09-30 19:16                     ` Marc Branchaud
2013-09-30 20:08                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-09-30 21:14                         ` Marc Branchaud
2013-09-30 22:44                           ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-09-30 23:18                             ` Jeff King
2013-10-01  3:04                             ` Marc Branchaud
2013-10-01  3:28                               ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-10-01 12:45                                 ` Marc Branchaud
2013-10-23 15:50 ` [PATCH 00/15] Change semantics of "fetch --tags" Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 15:50   ` [PATCH 01/15] t5510: use the correct tag name in test Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 15:50   ` [PATCH 02/15] t5510: prepare test refs more straightforwardly Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 18:36     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-24  6:49       ` Michael Haggerty
2013-10-24 19:50         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-23 15:50   ` [PATCH 03/15] t5510: check that "git fetch --prune --tags" does not prune branches Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 15:50   ` [PATCH 04/15] api-remote.txt: correct section "struct refspect" Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 18:43     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-24  7:06       ` Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 15:50   ` [PATCH 05/15] get_ref_map(): rename local variables Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 18:45     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-24  7:24       ` Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 15:50   ` [PATCH 06/15] ref_remove_duplicates(): avoid redundant bisection Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 15:50   ` [PATCH 07/15] ref_remove_duplicates(): simplify function Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 15:50   ` [PATCH 08/15] ref_remove_duplicates(): improve documentation comment Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 18:47     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-23 15:50   ` [PATCH 09/15] builtin/fetch.c: reorder function definitions Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 15:50   ` [PATCH 10/15] fetch --tags: fetch tags *in addition to* other stuff Michael Haggerty
2013-10-24 20:51     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-25 15:08       ` Michael Haggerty
2013-10-28 19:10         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-30  4:26           ` Michael Haggerty
2013-10-26  5:10       ` Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 15:50   ` [PATCH 11/15] fetch --prune: prune only based on explicit refspecs Michael Haggerty
2013-10-24 21:11     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-26  6:49       ` Michael Haggerty
2013-10-28 15:08         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-23 15:50   ` [PATCH 12/15] query_refspecs(): move some constants out of the loop Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 15:50   ` [PATCH 13/15] builtin/remote.c: reorder function definitions Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 15:50   ` [PATCH 14/15] builtin/remote.c:update(): use struct argv_array Michael Haggerty
2013-10-23 15:50   ` [PATCH 15/15] fetch, remote: properly convey --no-prune options to subprocesses Michael Haggerty
2013-10-24 21:17     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-23 16:59   ` [PATCH 00/15] Change semantics of "fetch --tags" Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130924075119.GD7257@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=cmn@elego.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=johan@herland.net \
    --cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=mschub@elegosoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).