From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] build: add default aliases Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 02:46:04 -0400 Message-ID: <20130924064604.GA7257@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1379791221-29925-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <20130924045325.GD2766@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130924053712.GA6114@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130924061830.GB6114@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, David Aguilar To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 24 08:46:15 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VOMNx-00020i-Nv for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:46:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750725Ab3IXGqJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 02:46:09 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:53639 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750717Ab3IXGqI (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 02:46:08 -0400 Received: (qmail 4066 invoked by uid 102); 24 Sep 2013 06:46:08 -0000 Received: from c-71-63-4-13.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.63.4.13) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 01:46:08 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 02:46:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:41:19AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > People who have different aliases for > > the same terms are unaffected on existing boxes, but slightly hindered > > on new boxes as the aliases do something else. > > Less hindered than in the current situation. I do not agree, but I've already explained my reasoning. I think we must agree to disagree on this. > cvs ci = cvs commit > cvs co = cvs checkout > > svn ci = svn commit > svn co = svn checkout > > hg ci = hg commit > hg co = hg checkout > > And somehow you think this is not natural and sensible? > > git ci = git commit > git co = git checkout > > I think it's as clear as day. If it is natural, sensible, and as clear as day, then why do people alias the commands to something besides what you show? -Peff