git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] git-config and large integers
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 22:43:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130821024355.GB25296@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqhaekudzp.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:41:30PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> If this applied on the writing side, I would understand it very
> much, i.e.
> 
> 	$ git config --int32 foo.size 2g
>         fatal: "2g" is too large to be read as "int32".

It does, by the way. When you request a type on the writing side, we
normalize (and complain in the same way as we do when reading).

> and as a complement it may make sense as a warning mechanism to also
> error out when existing value does not fit on the "platform" int, so
> your 
> 
> >>   $ git config --int foo.size
> >>   fatal: bad config value for 'foo.size' in .git/config
> 
> might make sense (even though I'd suggest being more explicit than
> "bad value" in this case---"the value specified will not fit when
> used in a variable of type int on this platform").

Yes, the error message is terrible, and I think an extra patch on top to
improve it is worth doing. But note that I am not introducing that error
here at all. On 32-bit systems, we already correctly range-checked and
produced that error. It is only on 64-bit systems that the range check
was flat out wrong. It checked against "long"'s precision, but then cast
the result to an int, losing bits. A possibly worse example than the
negative one is:

  $ git config foo.bar 4g
  $ git config --int foo.bar
  0

Again, that is what git's internal code is seeing. And that is why
keeping the range check for git-config has value: it lets you see what
git would see internally.

> When .git/config is shared on two different boxes (think: NFS), the
> size of "int" might be different between them, so the logic to produce
> such a warning may have to explicitly check against int32_t, not
> platform int and say "will not fit in 'int' on some machines".

I don't really see the value in that. You can always write whatever you
like in the config file. The reader is responsible during parsing for
saying "Hey, I am 32-bit and I can't handle this". And we already do
that, and it works fine. So if you have an NFS-shared .git/config, and
you set "pack.deltacachesize" to "4g", a 64-bit machine will do fine
with that, and a 32-bit machine will complain. Which seems like the only
sane thing to do.

There are a few config options that use "unsigned long" that I would
argue should be "off_t" or something (for example,
core.bigFileThreshold, which cannot be more than 4G on a 32-bit machine,
simply because we can't represent the size. On the other hand, there is
probably a ton of stuff that does not work with 4G files on such a
system, because we use unsigned long all over the place inside the
code).
-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-21  2:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-20 22:39 [PATCH 0/2] git-config and large integers Jeff King
2013-08-20 22:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] config: properly range-check integer values Jeff King
2013-08-20 23:07   ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-08-21  2:55     ` Jeff King
2013-08-20 22:44 ` [PATCH 0/2] git-config and large integers Stefan Beller
2013-08-20 22:48   ` Jeff King
2013-08-20 22:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] teach git-config to output " Jeff King
2013-08-20 22:57   ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-08-21  3:00     ` Jeff King
2013-08-21  4:38       ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-08-21  5:00         ` Jeff King
2013-08-21  6:34           ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-08-20 23:06 ` [PATCH 0/2] git-config and " Junio C Hamano
2013-08-20 23:41   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-08-21  2:43     ` Jeff King [this message]
2013-08-21  2:34   ` Jeff King
2013-09-08  8:27 ` [PATCHv2 0/5] " Jeff King
2013-09-08  8:29   ` [PATCH 1/5] config: factor out integer parsing from range checks Jeff King
2013-09-08  8:33   ` [PATCH 2/5] config: properly range-check integer values Jeff King
2013-09-08  8:36   ` [PATCH 3/5] config: set errno in numeric git_parse_* functions Jeff King
2013-09-09  0:36     ` Eric Sunshine
2013-09-09 19:53       ` Jeff King
2013-09-08  8:38   ` [PATCH 4/5] config: make numeric parsing errors more clear Jeff King
2013-09-08  8:40   ` [PATCH 5/5] git-config: always treat --int as 64-bit internally Jeff King
2013-09-09 18:58   ` [PATCHv2 0/5] git-config and large integers Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130821024355.GB25296@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).