From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] cat-file: add --batch-disk-sizes option Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:57:50 -0400 Message-ID: <20130710105750.GC9724@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20130707100133.GA18717@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130707100949.GC19143@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130707211538.GB6478@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "brian m. carlson" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 10 12:58:03 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uws5u-0007OF-QF for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:57:59 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753869Ab3GJK5z (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:57:55 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:47446 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752658Ab3GJK5y (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:57:54 -0400 Received: (qmail 23030 invoked by uid 102); 10 Jul 2013 10:59:11 -0000 Received: from c-98-244-76-202.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (98.244.76.202) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:59:11 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:57:50 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130707211538.GB6478@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 09:15:41PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: > On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 06:09:49AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > +NOTE: The on-disk size reported is accurate, but care should be taken in > > +drawing conclusions about which refs or objects are responsible for disk > > +usage. The size of a packed non-delta object be much larger than the > > You probably meant "may be" here. ^ Thanks, fixed in my re-roll. -Peff