On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:07:24AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "W. Trevor King" writes: > > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-clone.txt b/Documentation/git-clone.txt > > index a0727d7..8e5260f 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/git-clone.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/git-clone.txt > > @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ $ git clone --bare -l /home/proj/.git /pub/scm/proj.git > > * Create a repository on the kernel.org machine that borrows from Linus: > > + > > ------------ > > -$ git clone --bare -l -s /pub/scm/.../torvalds/linux-2.6.git \ > > +$ git clone --bare -l -s /pub/scm/.../torvalds/linux.git \ > > /pub/scm/.../me/subsys-2.6.git > > ------------ > > Aside from s|subsys-2.6|subsys| David already mentioned, I think > it is a lot saner to remove this particular example. Nobody runs > shell on k.org machines these days, and local borrowing "-l -s" is > already shown in another example. > > Also you seem to have missed another "linux-2.6 my2.6" clone in the > first example. Between the nfs-2.6 examples I mentioned earlier, the my2.6 clone here, and the: $ git clone --reference my2.6 \ git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/.../linux-2.7 \ my2.7 example listed later in git-clone.txt, I think we're trying to push linux.git examples too far ;). However, I can't think of a simple example for --reference that doesn't drag in a longer discussion to motivate shared object repositories. I'll hunt through the rest of the docs looking for other examples I can reuse. I think any doc rewrites should be outside the scope of this patch, which should just replace references to linux-2.6.git with linux.git (as it does). Further cleanups to remove references to the NFS and my2.{6,7} stuff and replace them with alternative examples can come as follow-up patches in v2 of this series. Does that sound reasonable? Should the size updates from 2/2 (user-manual: Update download size for Git and the kernel) go into the reroll, or have they been picked up in a separate branch? Cheers, Trevor -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy