git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] refs: do not invalidate the packed-refs cache unnecessarily
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 08:39:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130612123931.GD20461@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370987312-6761-13-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu>

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:48:32PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:

> Now that we keep track of the packed-refs file metadata, we can detect
> when the packed-refs file has been modified since we last read it, and
> we do so automatically every time that get_packed_ref_cache() is
> called.  So there is no need to invalidate the cache automatically
> when lock_packed_refs() is called; usually the old copy will still be
> valid.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
> ---
> This patch is optional.  It makes the assumption that the metadata
> stored in stat_validity are adequate to reliably detect when the
> packed-refs file has changed.  Given that we are about to rewrite the
> file, it is perhaps even more crucial not to make a mistake in this
> codepath than in others.  So if the stat_validity check is not
> considered safe enough, it might be prudent to omit this patch and
> continue to reload the packed-refs data here unconditionally.

I doubt that the risk is very high, but I'd also doubt that this
provides any useful performance improvement, because it is mostly
happening during a `git pack-refs` call. The exception is packing for a
ref deletion, and it could potentially speed up a receive-pack that was
deleting many refs.

I don't have a strong opinion either way.

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-12 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-11 21:48 [PATCH 00/12] Fix some reference-related races Michael Haggerty
2013-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 01/12] repack_without_ref(): split list curation and entry writing Michael Haggerty
2013-06-12 11:38   ` Jeff King
2013-06-12 11:56     ` Michael Haggerty
2013-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 02/12] pack_refs(): split creation of packed refs " Michael Haggerty
2013-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 03/12] refs: wrap the packed refs cache in a level of indirection Michael Haggerty
2013-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 04/12] refs: implement simple transactions for the packed-refs file Michael Haggerty
2013-06-12 12:01   ` Jeff King
2013-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 05/12] refs: manage lifetime of packed refs cache via reference counting Michael Haggerty
2013-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 06/12] do_for_each_entry(): increment the packed refs cache refcount Michael Haggerty
2013-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 07/12] packed_ref_cache: increment refcount when locked Michael Haggerty
2013-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 08/12] Extract a struct stat_data from cache_entry Michael Haggerty
2013-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 09/12] add a stat_validity struct Michael Haggerty
2013-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 10/12] get_packed_ref_cache: reload packed-refs file when it changes Michael Haggerty
2013-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 11/12] for_each_ref: load all loose refs before packed refs Michael Haggerty
2013-06-11 21:48 ` [PATCH 12/12] refs: do not invalidate the packed-refs cache unnecessarily Michael Haggerty
2013-06-12 12:39   ` Jeff King [this message]
2013-06-12 12:52 ` [PATCH 00/12] Fix some reference-related races Jeff King
2013-06-15 20:13 ` Ramsay Jones
2013-06-16  5:50   ` Michael Haggerty
2013-06-18 18:13     ` Ramsay Jones
2013-06-19  5:51       ` Michael Haggerty

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130612123931.GD20461@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=johan@herland.net \
    --cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).