Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] toposort: rename "lifo" field

[Jeff King <peff@peff.net>]

On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 04:24:34PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> The name "lifo", however, is too strongly tied to the way how the
> function implements its behaviour, and does not describe what the
> behaviour _means_.
> 
> Replace this field with an enum rev_sort_order, with two possible
> values: REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER and REV_SORT_BY_COMMIT_DATE, and
> update the existing code.  The mechanical replacement rule is:
> 
>   "lifo == 0" is equivalent to "sort_order == REV_SORT_BY_COMMIT_DATE"
>   "lifo == 1" is equivalent to "sort_order == REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER"

Thanks. Having looked at this code for the first time in a long time
recently, I was very confused by the purpose of the "lifo" flag; this
patch would have made it much clearer.

Patch itself looks fine to me.

-Peff