From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] send-email: fix suppress-cc=self on cccmd Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 22:58:34 +0300 Message-ID: <20130603195833.GA18883@redhat.com> References: <1369897638-27299-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1369897638-27299-3-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <7v7gibjieh.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20130603161556.GA16750@redhat.com> <7vd2s3f4uo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jun 03 21:58:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UjatW-0002qA-Lo for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 21:58:19 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758334Ab3FCT6I (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2013 15:58:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5234 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758158Ab3FCT6H (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2013 15:58:07 -0400 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r53Jw2AJ013177 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 3 Jun 2013 15:58:02 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (vpn1-4-128.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.4.128]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id r53Jw0U8022066; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 15:58:01 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vd2s3f4uo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:04:31AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > > > What I tried to do here is split the changes to small chunks and I > > picked a chunk of a later patch in an earlier one by mistake. > > > > So this is fixed up by patch 4/6 in the series, which redefines > > sender to have the sanitized value, everywhere. > > > > I guess I'll have to repost moving this former chunk to patch 4. > > Yeah, that may be a good idea. > > Thanks. Or just smash 2+4 together ... Confused. You are doing this or want me ot?