git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
	"Ramkumar Ramachandra" <artagnon@gmail.com>,
	"Alex Bennée" <kernel-hacker@bennee.com>,
	"Antoine Pelisse" <apelisse@gmail.com>,
	"John Keeping" <john@keeping.me.uk>,
	"Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] lookup_commit_reference_gently: do not read non-{tag,commit}
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 17:22:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130530212223.GA2135@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5cc40825d5b4fb3382e4c054c49adf5e6b6fe110.1369943791.git.trast@inf.ethz.ch>

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:00:23PM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:

> lookup_commit_reference_gently unconditionally parses the object given
> to it.  This slows down git-describe a lot if you have a repository
> with large tagged blobs in it: parse_object() will read the entire
> blob and verify that its sha1 matches, only to then throw it away.
> 
> Speed it up by checking the type with sha1_object_info() prior to
> unpacking.

This would speed up the case where we do not end up looking at the
object at all, but it will slow down the (presumably common) case where
we will in fact find a commit and end up parsing the object anyway.

Have you measured the impact of this on normal operations? During a
traversal, we spend a measurable amount of time looking up commits in
packfiles, and this would presumably double it.

This is not the first time I have seen this tradeoff in git.  It would
be nice if our object access was structured to do incremental
examination of the objects (i.e., store the packfile index lookup or
partial unpack of a loose object header, and then use that to complete
the next step of actually getting the contents).

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-30 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-30 10:38 Poor performance of git describe in big repos Alex Bennée
2013-05-30 11:33 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-05-30 13:09   ` Alex Bennée
2013-05-30 14:32     ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-05-30 15:01       ` Alex Bennée
2013-05-30 15:17         ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-05-30 15:33     ` Thomas Rast
2013-05-30 16:01       ` Alex Bennée
2013-05-30 16:21         ` Thomas Rast
2013-05-30 16:44           ` Thomas Rast
2013-05-30 19:01             ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-05-30 20:00             ` [PATCH 1/2] sha1_file: silence sha1_loose_object_info Thomas Rast
2013-05-30 20:00               ` [PATCH 2/2] lookup_commit_reference_gently: do not read non-{tag,commit} Thomas Rast
2013-05-30 21:22                 ` Jeff King [this message]
2013-05-31  0:52                   ` Duy Nguyen
2013-05-31  8:08                   ` Thomas Rast
2013-05-31 16:00                     ` Jeff King
2013-05-31  6:43                 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-05-31  8:16                   ` Thomas Rast
2013-05-30 19:30           ` Poor performance of git describe in big repos John Keeping
2013-05-31  8:14             ` Alex Bennée
2013-05-31  8:24               ` Thomas Rast
2013-05-31  8:40                 ` Alex Bennée
2013-05-31  8:46                   ` Thomas Rast
2013-05-31  9:57                     ` Alex Bennée
2013-06-03  8:02                       ` Alex Bennée
2013-06-03 16:32                         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-03 17:48                           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-05-31 10:27                     ` Thomas Rast
2013-05-31 16:17                       ` Jeff King
2013-06-03  8:39                         ` Alex Bennée
2013-06-03 14:49                           ` Jeff King
2013-05-31  8:32               ` John Keeping
2013-05-31  8:49                 ` Alex Bennée
2013-05-31  8:59                   ` John Keeping
2013-05-30 11:48 ` John Keeping
2013-05-30 12:29   ` Alex Bennée
2013-05-30 13:20     ` Duy Nguyen
     [not found]       ` <CAJ-05NPacjAEC99Ntd9eMnTD9_PMMYFob-_tAx5CeSB79TkRSg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-05-30 13:45         ` Duy Nguyen
2013-05-30 14:02           ` Alex Bennée
2013-05-30 13:16   ` Alex Bennée

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130530212223.GA2135@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=apelisse@gmail.com \
    --cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=john@keeping.me.uk \
    --cc=kernel-hacker@bennee.com \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=trast@inf.ethz.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).