git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] optimizing pack access on "read only" fetch repos
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 04:14:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130201091431.GC30644@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJo=hJuGw8x=VrjWhvZhzakuhWrCWr2FRuEsNt5gQNC=6PPuVw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 08:47:37AM -0800, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

> >>  - System resource cost we incur by having to keep 50 file
> >>    descriptors open and maintaining 50 mmap windows will reduce by
> >>    50 fold.
> >
> > I wonder how measurable that is (and if it matters on Linux versus less
> > efficient platforms).
> 
> It does matter. We know it has a negative impact on JGit even on Linux
> for example. You don't want 300 packs in a repository. 50 might be
> tolerable. 300 is not.

I'd love to see numbers if you have them. It's not that I don't believe
it is slower, but knowing _how much_ is important when thinking about
what kind of performance increase we are looking to get (which in turn
impacts how much effort to put into the repacking).

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-01  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-26 22:40 [PATCH 0/2] optimizing pack access on "read only" fetch repos Jeff King
2013-01-26 22:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] fetch: run gc --auto after fetching Jeff King
2013-01-27  1:51   ` Jonathan Nieder
     [not found]   ` <87bmopzbqx.fsf@gmail.com>
2017-07-12 20:00     ` git gc --auto aquires *.lock files that make a subsequent git-fetch error out Jeff King
2017-07-12 20:30       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-07-12 20:43         ` Jeff King
2013-01-26 22:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] fetch-pack: avoid repeatedly re-scanning pack directory Jeff King
2013-01-27 10:27   ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-01-27 20:09     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-27 23:20       ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-01-27  6:32 ` [PATCH 0/2] optimizing pack access on "read only" fetch repos Junio C Hamano
2013-01-29  8:06   ` Shawn Pearce
2013-01-29  8:29   ` Jeff King
2013-01-29 15:25     ` Martin Fick
2013-01-29 15:58     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-29 21:19       ` Jeff King
2013-01-29 22:26         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-31 16:47         ` Shawn Pearce
2013-02-01  9:14           ` Jeff King [this message]
2013-02-02 10:07             ` Shawn Pearce
2013-01-29 11:01   ` Duy Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130201091431.GC30644@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).