From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Voigt Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] git-submodule add: Add --local-branch option Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:16:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20121127191628.GC4185@book.hvoigt.net> References: <20121123175402.GH2806@odin.tremily.us> <20121127183125.GA4185@book.hvoigt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git , Junio C Hamano , Jeff King , Phil Hord , Shawn Pearce , Jens Lehmann , Nahor To: "W. Trevor King" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 27 20:19:08 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TdQgT-0006H0-EJ for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:19:05 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754211Ab2K0TSu (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:18:50 -0500 Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de ([80.67.31.24]:53277 "EHLO smtprelay01.ispgateway.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753742Ab2K0TSu (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:18:50 -0500 Received: from [77.21.76.22] (helo=localhost) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1TdQdx-0007Ae-4T; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:16:29 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121127183125.GA4185@book.hvoigt.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Df-Sender: aHZvaWd0QGh2b2lndC5uZXQ= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, I just realized that I gave you an confusing suggestion. On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:31:25PM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote: > if test "$subsha1" != "$sha1" > then > handle_on_demand_fetch_update ... > else > handle_tracked_branch_update ... > fi That obviously does not work. Here I meant of course something like: if test "$update_module" = "branch" then handle_tracked_branch_update ... else handle_on_demand_fetch_update ... fi Cheers Heiko