From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josef Wolf Subject: Re: Workflow for templates? Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 22:07:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20121106210719.GG28437@raven.wolf.lan> References: <20121025211522.GA28437@raven.wolf.lan> <3190de06-2eaf-4a39-91aa-9cc34c20fc8e@zcs> <20121031104403.GC28437@raven.wolf.lan> <20121106195045.GD28437@raven.wolf.lan> <871B6C10EBEFE342A772D1159D13208537AA184A@umechphj.easf.csd.disa.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: "git@vger.kernel.org" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 06 22:08:08 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TVqNT-0004vv-Dh for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 22:08:07 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752283Ab2KFVHx (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2012 16:07:53 -0500 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:52150 "EHLO mail.inka.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751141Ab2KFVHx (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2012 16:07:53 -0500 Received: from raven.inka.de (uucp@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 1TVqNE-0001MP-0n; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 22:07:52 +0100 Received: by raven.inka.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C86A3760DF; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 22:07:19 +0100 (CET) Mail-Followup-To: Josef Wolf , "git@vger.kernel.org" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871B6C10EBEFE342A772D1159D13208537AA184A@umechphj.easf.csd.disa.mil> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 08:21:25PM +0000, Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US) wrote: > Maybe I lost sight of your problem. Can you give a specific example of where "it" does not work? I guess it's _me_ who's lost. I can't figure how this is supposed to work. Maybe you have an example?