From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Baumann Subject: [OT] How to get the discussion details via notes Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:53:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20121031095327.GB18557@m62s10.vlinux.de> References: <1351623987-21012-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1351623987-21012-5-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <20121031003721.GV15167@elie.Belkin> <20121031060529.GA30432@elie.Belkin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 31 10:53:46 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TTUzY-0001ZC-An for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:53:44 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754030Ab2JaJxc (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 05:53:32 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:52163 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751687Ab2JaJxb (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 05:53:31 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2012 09:53:29 -0000 Received: from m62s10.vlinux.de (EHLO m62s10.vlinux.de) [83.151.21.204] by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 31 Oct 2012 10:53:29 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1252284 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+0TsorjM60Pqh2Q+x3mZQakHiI+ABdHY0ueWlzs6 u6hpV7yVcmx1NO Received: by m62s10.vlinux.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 49925EC002; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:53:27 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121031060529.GA30432@elie.Belkin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Dropping the Cc list, as this is off topic On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:05:29PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > > > Thanks for the thorough explanation. Perhaps some of that could make > > it's way into the commit message? > > It's fine with me if it doesn't, since the original commit message > covers the basics (current behavior and intent of the change) in its > first two paragraphs and anyone wanting more detail can use > > GIT_NOTES_REF=refs/remotes/charon/notes/full \ > git show --show-notes > > to find more details. I seem to miss something here, but I don't get it how the notes ref becomes magically filled with the details of this discussion. Care to explain? -Peter