From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] pathspec.c: Fix some sparse warnings Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 01:55:00 -0400 Message-ID: <20121029055500.GA4457@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <508D9EFF.3040900@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , git@adamspiers.org, GIT Mailing-list To: Ramsay Jones X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 29 06:55:21 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TSiJj-00057T-1p for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 06:55:19 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754399Ab2J2FzE (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 01:55:04 -0400 Received: from 75-15-5-89.uvs.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([75.15.5.89]:41806 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754305Ab2J2FzD (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 01:55:03 -0400 Received: (qmail 15617 invoked by uid 107); 29 Oct 2012 05:55:44 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 01:55:44 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 01:55:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <508D9EFF.3040900@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 09:09:19PM +0000, Ramsay Jones wrote: > I asked Adam to squash this patch into his 'as/check-ignore' branch > when he next re-rolled the branch. However, it appears that you > resubmitted that branch instead ... :-D > > I don't know if this branch is ready to progress to next yet, but > could somebody (yourself, Adam or Jeff?) please squash this into > commit 1a88ae42 ("pathspec.c: move reusable code from builtin/add.c") > before it hits next. I squashed it into my version of as/check-ignore, but if we are expecting a re-roll, please everybody remember to include it. -Peff