git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Kacper Kornet <draenog@pld-linux.org>
To: Drew Northup <n1xim.email@gmail.com>
Cc: Angelo Borsotti <angelo.borsotti@gmail.com>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git push tags
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:20:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121026182020.GF10560@camk.edu.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM9Z-nkBO1dbF-sBFLuxM_S_MT79Cx=gLEL+83XKB7ys8VTqNQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 02:07:09PM -0400, Drew Northup wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Kacper Kornet <draenog@pld-linux.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 05:16:00PM -0400, Drew Northup wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Angelo Borsotti
> >> <angelo.borsotti@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Are remote repositories less protected than the local ones? I
> >> > think that to be consistent, the same strategy should be used on all
> >> > repositories, i.e. rejecting changes on tags by default, unless they
> >> > are forced.

> >> So here we come to the core argument. Is sounds to me like you want
> >> changes to remote tags to work differently from push updates to ALL
> >> other references. The required change, if I'm not mistaken, would be
> >> for tags to not permit fast-forward updates while all other references
> >> would be pushed normally. From my brief and un-enlightened look at the
> >> push code I can't see that being as easy as it sounds.

> > I think the patch below obtains the requested behaviour:

> > diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
> > index 04fd9ea..7fcb51e 100644
> > --- a/remote.c
> > +++ b/remote.c
> > @@ -1320,7 +1320,7 @@ void set_ref_status_for_push(struct ref *remote_refs, int send_mirror,
> >                         !ref->deletion &&
> >                         !is_null_sha1(ref->old_sha1) &&
> >                         (!has_sha1_file(ref->old_sha1)
> > -                         || !ref_newer(ref->new_sha1, ref->old_sha1));
> > +                         || !prefixcmp(ref->name, "refs/tags") || !ref_newer(ref->new_sha1, ref->old_sha1));

> >                 if (ref->nonfastforward && !ref->force && !force_update) {
> >                         ref->status = REF_STATUS_REJECT_NONFASTFORWARD;

> > --
> >   Kacper Kornet

> Kacper,
> I obviously didn't dig deep enough. In any case, I presume that's what
> he's asking for. I can't remember if git is still forcing tags to
> always be located in "refs/tags" however. I didn't think it was.

I have based my assumption about location of tags on gitglossary:

tag
 A ref under refs/tags/ namespace that points to an object of an
 arbitrary type (typically a tag points to either a tag or a commit
 object).

-- 
  Kacper

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-26 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-25  6:58 git push tags Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-25 17:19 ` Drew Northup
2012-10-25 19:05   ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-25 21:16     ` Drew Northup
2012-10-26  6:42       ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-26 13:37         ` Drew Northup
2012-10-26 13:59           ` Chris Rorvick
2012-10-26 14:13             ` Drew Northup
2012-10-26 14:23               ` Chris Rorvick
2012-10-26 15:23           ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-26 17:42       ` Kacper Kornet
2012-10-26 18:07         ` Drew Northup
2012-10-26 18:20           ` Kacper Kornet [this message]
2012-10-26 18:35             ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-26 19:00               ` Kacper Kornet
2012-10-26 19:08                 ` Drew Northup
2012-10-28 18:15 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-10-28 19:59   ` Chris Rorvick
2012-10-28 21:49     ` Philip Oakley
2012-10-28 23:58       ` Drew Northup
2012-10-29  2:15       ` Chris Rorvick
2012-10-29  7:13       ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-29  8:12         ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-29  9:58           ` Michael Haggerty
2012-10-29 10:38             ` Jeff King
2012-10-29 11:21               ` Drew Northup
2012-10-29 11:31                 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-29 11:35                 ` Jeff King
2012-10-29 12:25                   ` Drew Northup
2012-10-29 13:24                   ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-29 17:23                   ` Kacper Kornet
2012-10-29 21:35                     ` Jeff King
2012-10-30 17:09                       ` Chris Rorvick
     [not found]                         ` <CAB9Jk9CC9wjeyggejkVjKgY2HGAFw70hJo-S0S-W-p4gnd2zug@mail.gmail.com>
2012-10-30 19:11                           ` Chris Rorvick
2012-10-29 10:10           ` Kacper Kornet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121026182020.GF10560@camk.edu.pl \
    --to=draenog@pld-linux.org \
    --cc=angelo.borsotti@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=n1xim.email@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).