From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] svn test: escape peg revision separator using empty peg rev Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 03:19:53 -0700 Message-ID: <20121009101953.GB28120@elie.Belkin> References: <1343468872-72133-1-git-send-email-schwern@pobox.com> <1343468872-72133-2-git-send-email-schwern@pobox.com> <20120728141652.GA1603@burratino> <50143E34.8090802@pobox.com> <20121009084145.GA19784@elie.Belkin> <5073F2C0.6000504@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Wong , Torsten Schmutzler , A Large Angry SCM , Michael G Schwern , git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, robbat2@gentoo.org, bwalton@artsci.utoronto.ca To: Michael J Gruber X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 09 12:20:09 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TLWv2-0002ad-VO for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:20:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753173Ab2JIKT6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2012 06:19:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:35598 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752183Ab2JIKT6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2012 06:19:58 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id rr4so4986911pbb.19 for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 03:19:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=DgSSz8GXrWWCHRxXoGJB6RoNHjsQhFR1jDFUoYvPpWE=; b=GQWaLxNBTS7qpuXTNq9ytvOl4Gobm2D+Nno7Pa3NZ+jcYiixxZ5mHh1RAs7VDA1TmA +36TndcWu2u3vCJKD7wx9yJmvT1eqBxRW3Tpe/VbaJI11/1p5ivSSjSUmHyOEhQvdbgG 4LeCTx4bvOI5P66dfu9BoqIFiwNQvPUSSDys/NVxP3oqeRK4hDmTU8fYMPtoKAP9qvaQ K2HE36pvkT814XKxg1igO4jR1nFnHVHPo18QZuUs+MAP7OlwJINozL5tBRljdo9R7NPl J/KfD5ScnNAW5ynMa1p/SZ7VYPUYlgYQJ4bghI+PaKhQaXdpEUtmJTkxuxgAK0UNu0fK f5Tg== Received: by 10.68.135.234 with SMTP id pv10mr61732948pbb.156.1349777997601; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 03:19:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elie.Belkin (c-67-180-61-129.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.180.61.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o1sm1199151paz.34.2012.10.09.03.19.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 09 Oct 2012 03:19:56 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5073F2C0.6000504@drmicha.warpmail.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+51 (9e756d1adb76) (2011-07-01) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Michael J Gruber wrote: > Jonathan Nieder venit, vidit, dixit 09.10.2012 10:41: >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder > > Tested with Subversion 1.6.18. [...] > I haven't checked other svn versions but this approach looks perfectly > sensible. It makes us test branch names which can't even be created > easily with current svn. Does svn really deserve this much attention? ;) Thanks for the quick and thorough feedback. I'm glad to hear it seems sane. ;-) > Seriously, our tests prepare us well for an svn remote helper... That might be a good reason to make a mock implementation of the existing git-svn interface on top of git-remote-svn. Sounds fun but hard. Ciao, Jonathan