From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Subject: Re: Fix git-svn for SVN 1.7
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 21:42:01 +0000
Message-ID: <20120802214201.GB24385@dcvr.yhbt.net>
References: <1343468872-72133-1-git-send-email-schwern@pobox.com>
 <20120802103122.GA24385@dcvr.yhbt.net>
 <20120802160753.GA17158@copier>
 <20120802205123.GA14391@dcvr.yhbt.net>
 <7vmx2dc7lw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org,
	robbat2@gentoo.org, bwalton@artsci.utoronto.ca,
	"Michael G. Schwern" <schwern@pobox.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 02 23:42:09 2012
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>)
	id 1Sx39l-00054r-0N
	for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 23:42:09 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753379Ab2HBVmE (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Thu, 2 Aug 2012 17:42:04 -0400
Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:33368 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753258Ab2HBVmC (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 2 Aug 2012 17:42:02 -0400
Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1])
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6655C1F42D;
	Thu,  2 Aug 2012 21:42:01 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7vmx2dc7lw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/202797>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> writes:
> > Thanks for reminding me, I went back to an old chroot 1.4.2 indeed
> > does fail canonicalization.
> >
> > Will bisect and squash a fix in.
> 
> Oops; should I eject this out of next and wait for a reroll, then?

Your call, I doubt anybody on next uses SVN 1.4.2.   Rerolling now.