From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: konglu@minatec.inpg.fr Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce --current option to git-branch builtin command. Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:18:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20120607131800.Horde.yryrAXwdC4BP0I3o4goH21A@webmail.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed DelSp=Yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Kenta Murata (?? ??)" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 07 13:18:16 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ScajC-0004fd-KH for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:18:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932317Ab2FGLSF convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 07:18:05 -0400 Received: from v-smtp.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr ([147.173.216.28]:59839 "EHLO v-smtp.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932309Ab2FGLSE (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 07:18:04 -0400 Received: from localhost (www02.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr [147.173.216.15]) by v-smtp.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D05B1A02F1; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 13:18:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wifi-028144.grenet.fr (wifi-028144.grenet.fr [130.190.28.144]) by webmail.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:18:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H4 (5.0.17) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Kenta Murata (?? ??)" a =E9crit=A0: > Introducing --current option to git-branch builtin command. > This option allows us to simply show the current branch name. In which case would you need to use this option ? Running 'git branch' is faster and would do the same thing. Even though you have a lot of branches as Vincent said (and so the output of 'git branch' would be quite verbose), I do not think that adding an option just for that is relevant. Lucien Kong