From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: konglu@minatec.inpg.fr Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/3] Advices about 'git rm' during conflicts (unmerged paths) more relevant Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 09:59:14 +0200 Message-ID: <20120531095914.Horde.McdhLnwdC4BPxyTSG9v3ctA@webmail.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr> References: <1338226598-16056-1-git-send-email-Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> <1338384216-18782-1-git-send-email-Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> <1338384216-18782-3-git-send-email-Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=";"; format=flowed DelSp=Yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Kong Lucien , git@vger.kernel.org, Duperray Valentin , Jonas Franck , Nguy Thomas , Nguyen Huynh Khoi Nguyen Lucien To: Matthieu Moy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 31 09:59:24 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sa0Hy-00051h-1U for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 09:59:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757932Ab2EaH7R convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2012 03:59:17 -0400 Received: from v-smtp.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr ([147.173.216.28]:57990 "EHLO v-smtp.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757764Ab2EaH7R (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2012 03:59:17 -0400 Received: from localhost (www02.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr [147.173.216.15]) by v-smtp.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F49B1A02F6; Thu, 31 May 2012 09:59:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wifi-028110.grenet.fr (wifi-028110.grenet.fr [130.190.28.110]) by webmail.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 31 May 2012 09:59:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H4 (5.0.17) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Matthieu Moy a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: >> Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/3] Advices about 'git rm' during conflicts =20 >> (unmerged paths) more relevant > > "more relevant" doesn't say much, and your subject line doesn't say i= t's > about "status". What about > > status: don't suggest "git rm" if not appropriate > > ? In the case of only 'both deleted', what we don't want 'git status' to = suggest is "git add". Maybe something like status: advices appropriated during conflicts or status: don't suggest "git rm" or "git add" if not appropriate would fit.