From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: The future of gitweb - part 2: JavaScript Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:50:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20110418135037.GE3258@machine.or.cz> References: <201102142039.59416.jnareb@gmail.com> <201104141154.55078.jnareb@gmail.com> <20110417201421.GV3258@machine.or.cz> <201104181534.31408.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, John Hawley , Kevin Cernekee To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 18 15:50:47 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QBoqk-0001Xj-J7 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:50:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753745Ab1DRNum (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:50:42 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:41926 "EHLO machine.or.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753018Ab1DRNul (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:50:41 -0400 Received: by machine.or.cz (Postfix, from userid 2001) id B657E1700313; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:50:37 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201104181534.31408.jnareb@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi! On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:34:30PM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote: > On Sun, 17 Apr 2011, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Girocco uses MooTools, and I also used it in an old private branch > > of gitweb. I have had pretty good experience with it. But since I wasn't > > able to find anyone to maintain Girocco's gitweb (or even keep it in > > sync with upstream) and the patch flow to core git has dried up, it's > > probably not too relevant argument. :-) > > Thanks. The information about MooTools is certain helpful. > > Do you remember why did you choose MooTools from other existing JavaScript > frameworks, including more popular jQuery? Unfortunately, it was few years back so I don't remember clearly anymore - it certainly was not a very educated guess, however, since I'm not really a JavaScript hacker. Possibly I just stumbled on a nicer guide for MooTools than jQuery at that time. By now, it's quite possible that jQuery is a friendlier alternative. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.