From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: The future of gitweb - part 2: JavaScript Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 23:17:55 +0200 Message-ID: <201104162317.56045.jnareb@gmail.com> References: <201102142039.59416.jnareb@gmail.com> <201104162132.57650.jnareb@gmail.com> <20110416204823.GA5586@external.screwed.box> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Vereshagin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Apr 16 23:18:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QBCsq-00056p-FL for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 23:18:24 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760447Ab1DPVSH (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Apr 2011 17:18:07 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:45770 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755627Ab1DPVSE (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Apr 2011 17:18:04 -0400 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so2383892fxm.19 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:18:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; bh=OiPaUf1ASikhKl6TFgrOpSJixwKXJbLwyrpLywcbZLo=; b=b+gPZU0vAdr36C39d9K/+AmvBWlcXcT+2W9lKLbLPIrzuKn8G/Yrl1nw2mEIGa4g2E /U6Sp3ZxxmxyRinQfvbNa0OqZhFF9X7iOLCkm/IfJStmRyAqk/8EPt4vTI17s4gq8uhU cMUlJXo/ZDe9GSaeesgUl0qTr237vlG/6yrO4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=QaCZHAtRJgz1nrb/FjZBUxTVmiQUznUEmheS/5HNNe7erWxSHjdGJ4BQ4lNlBvWNl2 aVrZCOa5NBZQvTrQMActQNTwoym4D12ZqGpoUBUncFeRIqDWfc9gESUq0xsJa98mtsug dOI8Gjqu5JZg51quChi/6qxyOnOgAplTLyipM= Received: by 10.223.98.5 with SMTP id o5mr1001887fan.33.1302988682649; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.13] (abvu151.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.8.218.151]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j18sm1186273faa.42.2011.04.16.14.18.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:18:01 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 In-Reply-To: <20110416204823.GA5586@external.screwed.box> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, Peter Vereshagin wrote: > God love is hard to find. You got lucky Jakub! > 2011/04/16 21:32:56 +0200 Jakub Narebski => To Peter Vereshagin : > > JN> No, fetching and pushing using HTTP transport, be it "smart" or "dumb" > JN> Gitweb is web interface for _viewing and browsing_ repositories using > > Good for purposes I described earlier. > Bad for users to have different URLs as "URL is UI element" (c) You can configure web server in such way that you can use the same URL for fetching with git as for browsing repository with web browser via gitweb, as described in git-http-backend manpage in one of examples and also at the end of gitweb/README. Nevertheless web browsing and fetching is done by two different programs. > JN> with ModPerl::Registry. > > but not PerlRun? If it runs ModPerl::Registry (persistently), then it runs ModPerl::PerlRun... but the reverse not always is true. -- Jakub Narebski Poland