From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert David Subject: Re: GSOC idea: build in scripts and cleanups Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:17:17 +0200 Organization: DDM Praha Message-ID: <201103302317.17855.robert.david.public@gmail.com> References: <201103260141.20798.robert.david.public@gmail.com> <20110328142121.GB14763@sigill.intra.peff.net> <201103301739.12691.trast@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1859848.1GTREOiQSX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff King , Jonathan Nieder , Git Mailing List , Matthieu Moy To: Thomas Rast X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 30 23:17:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q52li-0002YZ-Iv for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:17:34 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965191Ab1C3VRZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:17:25 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:60740 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964852Ab1C3VRW (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:17:22 -0400 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so1382192fxm.19 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:17:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=a0ABGwbZl+SGjHixuy6RFXsxD/NTS1JNTBE4clMceYI=; b=fqfX/ub7Ubzx3H4kF5JM5eqiOvsGCIJjuJGooqwQEqw5QEpEpEzasOmDVFTOEgHm/H a95iJVW3XZzQsVQ44zWpNJLvxNns15ujt0qyUIUtTzy0GPowUK0ufNhl8DILoY3Q7mHR BDQ79tstAUQXkfaAbQqt4/ZWKb2s0imZ810RQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; b=f+SzR65Zj7RVqVDhn5b2ly00VDW3CddFomp+1l+l+b5NEi19egV9RGRCKTGAd+gOS9 q6ddEiIf8EjADSyWkHA7bmi8HrkK+RF9uP5/DREhe6zshWjsO+SJSiG86EMZ+5R9wwNY Xd25K03wiUo6f0+olNY+kw3sqHslbJuB0EyxE= Received: by 10.223.117.134 with SMTP id r6mr1891935faq.147.1301519841536; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from robert-eee.localnet (gate.chabry.cz [80.92.246.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p16sm175065fax.21.2011.03.30.14.17.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:17:19 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-5-686; KDE/4.4.5; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <201103301739.12691.trast@student.ethz.ch> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --nextPart1859848.1GTREOiQSX Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dne st=C5=99eda 30 b=C5=99ezna 2011 17:39:12 Thomas Rast napsal(a): > Jeff King wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:55:22AM +0200, Robert David wrote: > > > > As far as cleanup versus features, I think Thomas would have to > > > > comment on that. He is the one who did the most work on patch-mode, > > > > and therefore the one who most thinks it needs cleaned up. :) > > >=20 > > > Is Thomas going to be a mentor in this task? > >=20 > > I hope so. I can also co-mentor if it helps. >=20 > I'm certainly ready; I didn't propose any projects that I would not > also mentor. (However, I won't mentor more than one...) Thank you for your attention. >=20 > Note that while it's certainly a bonus, porting it to C probably makes > the project more difficult and time-consuming. We'll have to see in > the proposal timelines however. It is not a big problem to me. I plan to begin full time work on this in ha= lf=20 June. Before that I plan some cleanups and fixes to simplify the upcoming porting. >=20 > As for cleanup, my gut feeling right now is that the Perl code can > probably cope with incremental cleanups as required for each feature. > On the other hand, the C port should start from a clean redesign so as > to not rewrite it twice. I agree that porting to C should be done from scratch. Thats why I would cl= ean=20 and extend the script first to make a "preview". Than when it will comply=20 with requirements, I will port that from scratch to C. Robert --nextPart1859848.1GTREOiQSX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EABEIAAYFAk2Tnd0ACgkQLSNWchw0XGyM/QEAk7N/BnujWSrN5nZtzVkGupYx ztdc1lq1jZyw8+B5INgA/1gqi3Kha0M7C6COVRKJLTdDuHaP7wU2zQ3vYi24JA/d =2c7Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1859848.1GTREOiQSX--