From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SZEDER =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor?= Subject: Re: git bisect problems/ideas Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:38:44 +0100 Message-ID: <20110117133843.GA23625@neumann> References: <855249CA-A006-475C-8F96-EFD614795064@gmail.com> <20110117115133.GA29207@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Christian Couder , "Aaron S. Meurer" , To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jan 17 14:44:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PepNb-0003Rz-N9 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:44:20 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752767Ab1AQNoO convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:44:14 -0500 Received: from ex-e-1.perimeter.fzi.de ([141.21.8.250]:13750 "EHLO EX-E-1.perimeter.fzi.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752510Ab1AQNoN (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:44:13 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 326 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:44:13 EST Received: from ex-ca-ht-1.fzi.de (141.21.32.98) by EX-E-1.perimeter.fzi.de (141.21.8.250) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:38:42 +0100 Received: from localhost6.localdomain6 (141.21.7.126) by ex-ca-ht-1.fzi.de (141.21.32.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:38:44 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110117115133.GA29207@burratino> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 05:51:33AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Christian Couder wrote: >=20 > > Yeah, many people find it difficult to reverse the meaning of "bad" > > and "good" when looking for a fix. There were some suggestions at s= ome > > points to do something about it. Some of the suggestions were to us= e > > some aliases for "good" and "bad", but there was no agreement. Othe= r > > suggestions had a patch attached but the patch was not good enough = or > > something. >=20 > Any pointers to such a discussion or patch? Maybe whatever small > detail caused it to be forgotten could be fixed... http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/86063 Best, G=E1bor