From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix to push --progress. The --progress flag was not being passed into tranport.c from send-pack.h, making the --progress flag unusable Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:55:08 -0400 Message-ID: <20101013175508.GA14035@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <7vr5fum19m.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Chase Brammer , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 13 19:55:09 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P65Xg-00035v-36 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:55:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752601Ab0JMRyr (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:54:47 -0400 Received: from xen6.gtisc.gatech.edu ([143.215.130.70]:42493 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751457Ab0JMRyq (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:54:46 -0400 Received: (qmail 725 invoked by uid 111); 13 Oct 2010 17:54:46 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (129.79.255.167) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:54:46 +0000 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:55:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vr5fum19m.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:49:09AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Chase Brammer writes: > > > The result of this is external tools and tools writing standard error > > Thanks for leaving a record in the list archive, but (1) what Jonathan > said, plus (2) Please do something about that overlong Subject: line. Actually, I was initially trying to foist testing and patch submission off on somebody else because I didn't want to spend more time on it. But I ended up doing it anyway, and I think I will have a two-patch series. This one (with tests), and one to make --no-progress. I'll try to work it up this afternoon. -Peff