From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Stein Subject: Re: [PATCH] send-email: Ask for in-reply message ID even if from and to is already known Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:11:59 +0200 Message-ID: <201006112211.59425.alexander.stein@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de> References: <201006101908.19578.alexander.stein@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de> <7vtyp9ie2a.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 11 22:12:14 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONAaJ-00072W-88 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:12:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756918Ab0FKUMF (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:12:05 -0400 Received: from jack.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.132.46]:56177 "EHLO jack.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756316Ab0FKUME (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:12:04 -0400 Received: from 77-64-189-43.dynamic.primacom.net ([77.64.189.43] helo=kongar.localnet) by jack.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONAa7-0000yP-VT; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:12:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.32-gentoo-r7; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <7vtyp9ie2a.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: --- Start der SpamAssassin 3.3.0 Textanalyse (-0.9 Punkte) Fragen an/questions to: Postmaster TU Chemnitz * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.1 TVD_RCVD_IP TVD_RCVD_IP --- Ende der SpamAssassin Textanalyse X-Scan-Signature: e3a4f6e1275be1643272008be9fceab0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am Freitag 11 Juni 2010, 21:06:53 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Did you run the existing test suite unattended and make sure everything > still passes? During test suite run I noticed this patch doesn't allow to run the suite unattended. This may only work with some config option as Matthieu already pointed out. I will rethink about this problem and repost a new patch Alexander