From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SZEDER =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: mention 'git stash pop --index' option explicitly Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 23:42:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20090608214243.GK13773@neumann> References: <27f7124b574aa6ac4391b9bd029242ceb5874447.1244475542.git.szeder@ira.uka.de> <7viqj6xvv8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jun 08 23:42:56 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MDmcJ-0002SF-C4 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:42:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753735AbZFHVmq convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:42:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751709AbZFHVmp (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:42:45 -0400 Received: from francis.fzi.de ([141.21.7.5]:40294 "EHLO exchange.fzi.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751089AbZFHVmo (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:42:44 -0400 Received: from [127.0.1.1] ([91.19.66.149]) by exchange.fzi.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 23:42:44 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7viqj6xvv8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jun 2009 21:42:44.0454 (UTC) FILETIME=[0E90E860:01C9E882] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 02:23:55PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > SZEDER G=E1bor writes: >=20 > > -'git stash' (show | drop | pop ) [] > > +'git stash' (show | drop ) [] > > +'git stash' pop [--index] [] > > 'git stash' apply [--index] [] >=20 > Why not "(pop | apply) [--index]"? >=20 > Other than that looks sensible. Dunno. I didn't like it somehow, but could not tell why. But even then, I should have followed the convention of (show | drop). Will resend both patch after dinner.