From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [Patch] Prevent cloning over http from spewing Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:54:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20090608115431.GC13775@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20090602174229.GA14455@infidigm.net> <7vmy8p8947.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20090603191050.GB29564@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20090603191555.GL3355@spearce.org> <20090604160152.GA13984@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , Junio C Hamano , Jakub Narebski , sparse@infidigm.net, git@vger.kernel.org To: Tay Ray Chuan X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jun 08 13:54:49 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MDdRA-0001CC-OL for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:54:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754765AbZFHLyk convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:54:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754748AbZFHLyj (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:54:39 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:54799 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754727AbZFHLyi (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:54:38 -0400 Received: (qmail 21219 invoked by uid 107); 8 Jun 2009 11:54:49 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:54:49 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:54:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 06:31:38PM +0800, Tay Ray Chuan wrote: > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 something like > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Fetching %s (got %d packs, %d loose): (%= d/%d) > [...] > Hmm, just wondering, is this is the intended display for "-q" or "-v"= ? > Or should I do isatty(), like builtin-pack-objects.c does for the > "Writing objects" progress indicator? I was imagining: - without "-q", show progress if isatty(1). - with "-q", never show progress - with "-v", show the "getting pack" and "walk" output we show now; without "-v", don't show it. "-v" has no impact on the progress indicator.=20 -Peff