From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Wesley J. Landaker" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] send-email: --smtp-server-port should take an integer Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:01:05 -0600 Organization: icecavern.net Message-ID: <200904111501.05734.wjl@icecavern.net> References: <1239139522-24118-1-git-send-email-mfwitten@gmail.com> <1239139522-24118-2-git-send-email-mfwitten@gmail.com> <7vvdpbf11m.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Witten , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Apr 11 23:06:04 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LskOn-00081p-Sg for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:06:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753738AbZDKVBR (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:01:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753324AbZDKVBQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:01:16 -0400 Received: from rinoa.icecavern.net ([92.243.7.152]:38682 "EHLO icecavern.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753255AbZDKVBP (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:01:15 -0400 Received: from chocobo.localnet (c-76-113-110-228.hsd1.nm.comcast.net [76.113.110.228]) by icecavern.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DEFF336580; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:01:10 -0600 (MDT) User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.27-14-generic; KDE/4.2.0; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <7vvdpbf11m.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Saturday 11 April 2009 13:22:29 Junio C Hamano wrote: > Hmm, I have to wonder if there somebody who is using symbolic names for > ports, e.g. --smtp-server-port=ssmtp which this patch may start > rejecting. An common example is --smtp-server-port=submission (for 587).