From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Sebrecht Subject: [PATCH RFC 1/6] Re: send-email: Add --delay for separating emails Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:45:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20090409174547.GA15767@vidovic> References: <49dcb464.06d7720a.66ca.ffffbd30@mx.google.com> <20090409161756.GA12910@vidovic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Nicolas Sebrecht , git@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Witten X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 09 19:47:29 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LryLY-0000OV-Uu for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:47:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935231AbZDIRp4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:45:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765446AbZDIRpy (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:45:54 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.218.169]:44162 "EHLO mail-bw0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758534AbZDIRpx (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:45:53 -0400 Received: by bwz17 with SMTP id 17so703807bwz.37 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:45:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=183h/GKO/cmB38guiJNKeZvdF38oGcdLGbVGqW7JjZ4=; b=s6gtGKYM5aYFkDJcDgcYjL1yew2ptRrLW3bHpVjUT5B9wMitsewS35DsUDBDcae5Gs otsnaUwAmeY59WdbyMOXoNIPeKgS9VXhH7kggK3W4G4XYCTAyGMuz4jf6LMOQc6+g19T 3518Iakw3Oi+bf1+9UbFLk+FCpbEi34PmbsPc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=hAsy+n2x7jyCyv21EN5C1NI5MfZuvcDDQG3wXpN9L5x6HMgVUy4zNXpVrIW1ImYvBG NefxU49uvpp29Ou3HeGkIXspgXnKNhQbNAFsB4xTa5mTnKid5TtMEWIsjQCPSP7XGGXb MDi3ekN+f+nkQaoGF7pAmXSoBaZ5Pd1HQsjbM= Received: by 10.103.240.5 with SMTP id s5mr1380103mur.133.1239299150776; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from @ (91-165-136-189.rev.libertysurf.net [91.165.136.189]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 25sm1019165mul.21.2009.04.09.10.45.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 12:27:18PM -0500, Michael Witten wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:17, Nicolas Sebrecht > wrote: > > > > The --delay option may have an undesirable side effect. In case of > > non-chained emails, unrelated mails could be insterted between patches > > where *all* MUA would be affected. It's not only true for very high > > volume message mailing-lists (million monkeys receiving...). FMPOV, it's > > worse than all display issues we already know or have with the current > > behaviour. > > But it's already impossible to protect against this scenario. But we could forbid the use of --delay with non-chained emails, no? Or at least, warn it should not be used. -- Nicolas Sebrecht