From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/6] Re: send-email: Add --delay for separating emails Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:05:52 -0400 Message-ID: <20090408060552.GB26079@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <1239139522-24118-1-git-send-email-mfwitten@gmail.com> <20090407215143.GA18144@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20090407220854.GA12908@vidovic> <49DBD112.5000705@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Ericsson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 08 08:07:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LrQwa-0006xG-QC for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 08:07:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759620AbZDHGF5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:05:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758687AbZDHGF4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:05:56 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:34308 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757217AbZDHGF4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:05:56 -0400 Received: (qmail 14174 invoked by uid 107); 8 Apr 2009 06:05:55 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:05:55 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:05:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49DBD112.5000705@op5.se> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:17:54AM +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > For those two reasons, I absolutely loathe deeply nested > in-reply-to chains. Agreed. I don't know if you saw: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/109790 a while back. -Peff