From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: [PATCH] bash completion: Hide more plumbing commands Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 00:31:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20080903223118.GW10544@machine.or.cz> References: <20080826171012.GO10360@machine.or.cz> <20080826171144.21328.82727.stgit@localhost> <20080826172410.GJ26523@spearce.org> <7v1w0bab1c.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080903222350.GC10360@machine.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , git@vger.kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 04 00:32:31 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kb0to-0002X2-Kv for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:32:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752103AbYICWbX (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 18:31:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751773AbYICWbX (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 18:31:23 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:51479 "EHLO machine.or.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751757AbYICWbW (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 18:31:22 -0400 Received: by machine.or.cz (Postfix, from userid 2001) id F20573939B3B; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 00:31:18 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080903222350.GC10360@machine.or.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 12:23:50AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > I started on a patch, but frankly, I hate it. Adding such a filtering to > git-status is quite invasive, while I believe that it's simply not worth > it - I have yet to encounter a situation with git when simply looking at > either git diff or plain git status is impractical to check which files > need to be merged yet, so I don't want to expend energy on a patch which > is going to be ugly and useless by my belief. > > If you do insist that we need this functionality, can you please just > drop the git ls-files bit from the patch, or should I resend it? It just occured to me - what about git diff --diff-filter=U [--name-status] or is that too long? (The universal answer being, "you can alias it". ;-) Petr "Pasky" Baudis