From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Teemu Likonen Subject: Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:52:11 +0300 Message-ID: <20080828195211.GA3545@mithlond.arda.local> References: <38B725C0-40C3-496C-AAD4-4EA65E3085F5@cs.indiana.edu> <48B5BC5F.4070209@kernel.org> <7vd4jukphm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080828090421.GQ10360@machine.or.cz> <18219E52-E56F-43D9-B28D-0CC74E225CC5@cs.indiana.edu> <7BC51BEC-E230-48C5-BD3E-2CECE3C7FC98@cs.indiana.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , Petr Baudis , Kristian H??gsberg , Matthias Kestenholz , Steven Rostedt , Jeff King , Ulrich Windl , Andi Kleen , Johannes Schindelin , Junio C Hamano , David Woodhouse , git@vger.kernel.org To: Perry Wagle X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 28 21:54:54 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KYnZm-0005vX-H0 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:54:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753967AbYH1TxI (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:53:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753482AbYH1TxI (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:53:08 -0400 Received: from mta-out.inet.fi ([195.156.147.13]:41915 "EHLO jenni1.inet.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753967AbYH1TxH (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:53:07 -0400 Received: from mithlond.arda.local (80.220.180.181) by jenni1.inet.fi (8.5.014) id 488F1534015D52AE; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:52:16 +0300 Received: from dtw by mithlond.arda.local with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KYnXP-0002cr-MR; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:52:11 +0300 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7BC51BEC-E230-48C5-BD3E-2CECE3C7FC98@cs.indiana.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Perry Wagle wrote (2008-08-28 12:24 -0700): > Is is really only that I > > sed s/git-/git/g > > on the scripts? I'm doubting it, given the quality of reasoning and > lack of respect for upward compatibility on this thread. I have come to understand that "git " has quite long time been more robust and portable way of writing scripts. They work in both configurations so I'd definitely suggest doing "s/git-/git /g" for every script. Of course in an interactive shell everyone can use whatever they prefer and works at the moment.