From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:50:19 -0400 Message-ID: <20080827195019.GA9962@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20080826164526.GM26610@one.firstfloor.org> <48B5098E.748.A598B62@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Ulrich Windl , Andi Kleen , Kristian H??gsberg , Matthias Kestenholz , Johannes Schindelin , users@kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , David Woodhouse , git@vger.kernel.org To: Perry Wagle X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 27 21:51:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KYR3A-00044O-Uz for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 21:51:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751153AbYH0TuX (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:50:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751247AbYH0TuX (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:50:23 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:2035 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750990AbYH0TuW (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:50:22 -0400 Received: (qmail 15709 invoked by uid 111); 27 Aug 2008 19:50:21 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:50:21 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:50:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:43:23PM -0700, Perry Wagle wrote: > Doing git- was shocking to me at first, but it also showed me a list > of commands for me to learn. > > Now I guess that when everything's fixed up, I'll have to put in a space > instead of a dash to get exactly the same thing. > > What difference did changing the dash to a space make? Did you miss the part of the thread about how it's not exactly the same thing, but rather substantially fewer commands (and there is even additional discussion about _which_ commands)? -Peff