From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:45:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20080826164526.GM26610@one.firstfloor.org> References: <7vprnzt7d5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <1219664940.9583.42.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <7vy72kek6y.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080826145719.GB5046@coredump.intra.peff.net> <1219764860.4471.13.camel@gaara.bos.redhat.com> <1219766398.7107.87.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <1f6632e50808260904t6bea0be5kc69342917e3db97@mail.gmail.com> <20080826162513.GR10544@machine.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matthias Kestenholz , Kristian H??gsberg , Johannes Schindelin , users@kernel.org, Jeff King , Junio C Hamano , David Woodhouse , git@vger.kernel.org To: Petr Baudis X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Aug 26 18:44:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KY1ed-0007Bk-7S for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:44:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757342AbYHZQnF (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:43:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757205AbYHZQnD (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:43:03 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:47841 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757342AbYHZQnB (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:43:01 -0400 Received: by one.firstfloor.org (Postfix, from userid 503) id 1C08E1B90085; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:45:27 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080826162513.GR10544@machine.or.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 06:25:13PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 06:04:00PM +0200, Matthias Kestenholz wrote: > > Correct, but there is a benefit. Imagine a new user: > > > > git- ... what? 140-something commands? I'll better start looking > > for alternatives _right now_! > > Actually, this is the only realistic argument I can remember at all. It's not very convincing, because the bash completions script file for git is installed by default[1] which completes both forms, so the new user will experience instead: git.... what? 140-something commands? etc.etc. Someone didn't think this through? I won't disagree that the 140 commands thing is a problem -- I remember thinking the same thoughts and I am still scared occasionally by the multitude of commands. But that doesn't seem to be the solution. -Andi [1] At least it's in my openSUSE build service git-core rpm by default.