From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-ls-tree.txt: Add a caveat about prefixing pathspec Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:46:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20080728004604.GF32184@machine.or.cz> References: <20080720233956.GH10151@machine.or.cz> <20080721075618.14163.45309.stgit@localhost> <7v1w1nvf7q.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080721210452.GP10151@machine.or.cz> <7vd4l6sqqz.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080722224759.GJ32184@machine.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 28 02:47:09 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNGtI-0007ki-ML for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:47:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756902AbYG1AqI (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:46:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756755AbYG1AqH (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:46:07 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:41659 "EHLO machine.or.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756370AbYG1AqG (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:46:06 -0400 Received: by machine.or.cz (Postfix, from userid 2001) id 2B295393B928; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:46:04 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080722224759.GJ32184@machine.or.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:47:59AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 05:32:20PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Petr Baudis writes: > > > > >> commit. E.g. > > >> > > >> $ cd some/deep/path > > >> $ git ls-tree --name-only -r HEAD~20 > > >> > > >> will list the files in some/deep/path (i.e. where you are) 20 > > >> commits ago, just like running "/bin/ls" there will give you the > > >> list of files you have right now. > > > > > > Frankly, I think this is overdoing it. I'm all for being positive, but > > > it is obvious why this is good thing when you inspect a root tree and > > > there's no need to be too wordy about it... > > > > I mildly disagree. > > We may throw a dice or go with your version, I don't care *that* much > about this change, I just wouldn't make it personally. What is the status of this patch? :-) Dropped altogether? Petr "Pasky" Baudis