From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: git-scm.com
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:37:07 +0200
Message-ID: <20080726023707.GX32184@machine.or.cz>
References: <d411cc4a0807251035i7aed2ec9wef7e8f1b3ae4c585@mail.gmail.com> <6b6419750807251838h12ea4f19gdff107694e3797c4@mail.gmail.com> <d411cc4a0807251928g75744b78vac2ce77bf07fbd81@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Patrick Aljord <patcito@gmail.com>, git list <git@vger.kernel.org>
To: Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 26 04:38:11 2008
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1KMZfd-0000Xb-Tn
	for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:38:10 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752560AbYGZChK (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:37:10 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752539AbYGZChK
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:37:10 -0400
Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:59818 "EHLO machine.or.cz"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752538AbYGZChJ (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:37:09 -0400
Received: by machine.or.cz (Postfix, from userid 2001)
	id D313C393B8E1; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:37:07 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d411cc4a0807251928g75744b78vac2ce77bf07fbd81@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/90154>

  Hi,

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 07:28:32PM -0700, Scott Chacon wrote:
> I am more concerned about the logo at the bottom, and Petr and I are
> discussing this - I can remove the logo, but then I'd have to pay for
> this out of my pocket instead of having a small logo on the page.

  I actually think that this is *one* reference to GitHub that is
perfectly and 100% okay; if it is sponsoring the hosting, it deserves
the logo, and it is fairly non-intrusive. I _am_ watching out warily
for excessive GitHub references within the rest of the site - if only
because I have kind of personal interest in a competitor of GitHub and
thus don't want GitHub to get unwarranted free advertising. :-)

				Petr "Pasky" Baudis