From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: git-scm.com Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:33:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20080726023312.GW32184@machine.or.cz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Scott Chacon , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 26 04:34:18 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KMZbr-0008I5-0c for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:34:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752486AbYGZCdP (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:33:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752482AbYGZCdP (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:33:15 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:52571 "EHLO machine.or.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752443AbYGZCdO (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:33:14 -0400 Received: by machine.or.cz (Postfix, from userid 2001) id ADF80393B334; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:33:12 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 04:25:16AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Scott Chacon wrote: > > > A followup on the post I did a few days ago about Git documentation. > > I forked Petr's git.or.cz site and put up a version that I think is a > > bit more accessible and newbie-friendly at git-scm.com. > > I do not like the implication that Git eats trees. yes, I keep wondering about the logo as well. On one side it is rather amusing, on the other side... somehow it didn't win my heart over and it *does* look somewhat unprofessional. > I also do not like that the link to "Documentation" looks more like a > too-short cheat-sheet. I personally don't find the idea of having direct links to the most used commands bad, though I'm not sure how useful will it be in practice. > But then, I think that git.or.cz looks more professional (read: more > respectful, less geekish), so I think there is not much harm in that. Note that I tried to fix up a lot of bits that I felt were a little too colloquial in my patch series I linked in a previous mail. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis As in certain cults it is possible to kill a process if you know its true name. -- Ken Thompson and Dennis M. Ritchie