From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nanako Shiraishi Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:20:42 +0900 Message-ID: <20080720192042.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> References: <7vlk01hqzz.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080718175040.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jul 20 12:22:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KKW3Z-0001gh-0N for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:22:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755541AbYGTKVO (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:21:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755452AbYGTKVO (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:21:14 -0400 Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33]:48303 "EHLO karen.lavabit.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754556AbYGTKVO (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:21:14 -0400 Received: from b.earth.lavabit.com (b.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.11]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68D3C88E0; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 05:21:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from nanako3.lavabit.com (212.62.97.20) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id ZF2DYTC28UF3; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 05:21:13 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=qB7q7gRVwmfozh8j8LFS7I3QOsm3ESHnJfZeQal3YqatCT6YKVWjqKVvreVeD9bmmowhQQuNmSNfnLqY49Sa3n+gDO0ivjwFjldPNwf5AO0jhQ75wlxrcG1A6v1dAae6VBYg7yFgVbu2qlk07iQf4RvbH+wyw6OXIgdmzJkWoF4=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Quoting Johannes Schindelin ; In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Quoting Johannes Schindelin : > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Nanako Shiraishi wrote: > >> Quoting Junio C Hamano : >> > This needs to be merged to master iff/when merge-theirs gets merged, >> > but I do not think this series is widely supported, so both are on >> > hold. >> >> Why do you say it is not widely supported? I may be wrong but I think >> you developed these patches after somebody from the mailing list asked >> for this feature. > > Asking for a feature, and then not doing a single thing to defend why it > makes sense, of a single person, who does not even speak up now, does not > count for "wide support". For the record, I was not the one who asked for such a feature. It seems that the conclusion of the discussion is that "theirs" promotes a bad workflow, and I am happy with that. -- Nanako Shiraishi http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/